Why we exist

Your company automated everything except itself

Finance, sales, support and engineering each got a system of record decades ago. How the organization is actually designed, governed and led is still carried in slide decks, offsites, and the memory of whoever has been there longest. That is the gap we are closing.

The shift

Measuring an organization is not the same as modelling one

Surveys tell you how last quarter felt. Dashboards tell you what already happened. Neither hands you something you can work on, because neither holds a model of the organization itself.

What the category does today

  • Runs the HR process: hiring, reviews, payroll, leave
  • Measures sentiment after the fact, once a quarter if you are lucky
  • Reports activity and leaves the interpretation to you
  • Keeps strategy in one system and the people executing it in another
  • Treats culture as something you survey rather than something you design

What Green Apple does instead

  • Holds a live model of the organization: its DNA, structure, governance, ownership and metrics
  • Connects strategy to the daily work, so drift surfaces while you can still act on it
  • Explains its reasoning every time, so you are able to disagree with it
  • Improves the model continuously instead of reporting on a fixed one
  • Treats culture as a system you build and tend, which is what it has always been
How it works

This is the part that usually gets a demo video

We would rather show you the reasoning. A leader asks a question, the assistant reads the organization's own model, drafts something specific, and then waits.

Leader

Asks

“Our retention objective is slipping and I cannot tell whether it is the goal or the team. What does the organization actually show?”

Green Apple

Reads the model

Pulls the active cycle, the objectives underneath it, the metrics bound to each one, and the org units that own them. Not a document search. The organization's own structure.

Green Apple

Proposes

Drafts a key result with a baseline, a target and an owner, names the assumption it is making, and flags the two objectives that quietly contradict each other.

Leader

Decides

Approve, edit, or reject. Every proposal is stored with who approved it and why, so the decision trail survives the person who made it.

AI that supports, never supplants. That is a design constraint rather than a slogan: there is no code path in the platform that writes to your organization without a human approving it first.

Already shipped

None of this is a roadmap

The platform is live and the following is running in production today, stated plainly and without adjectives.

languages shipped, with Arabic and Urdu fully right-to-left
15languages shipped, with Arabic and Urdu fully right-to-left
independent layers enforcing tenant isolation on every record
3independent layers enforcing tenant isolation on every record
writes to your organization without a human approving them
0writes to your organization without a human approving them

Organizational DNA: purpose, values and the lenses to pressure-test them, with an anonymous monthly pulse feeding the lived version back

Structure: entities, units, positions and roles, edited on a draft-then-publish canvas with 33 validation rules before anything goes live

Governance: bodies, policies, meetings and decisions, each with the trail of who decided what

Ownership: cycles, objectives and weighted key results, graded when the cycle closes rather than quietly forgotten

Metrics: a connected metric tree, an ingest API, and an executive dashboard built on the same model

A public API and MCP server, so other AI systems can read and act on the model with scoped, revocable access

Where this goes

What we intend to be true by 2030

Not predictions about the industry. Commitments about this product, with dates attached so you are able to hold us to them.

  1. 2027

    DNA that keeps itself current

    Your organization's DNA stops being a document someone wrote in a workshop and becomes a living model that revises itself from how people actually behave.

  2. 2028

    The organization becomes answerable

    Any leader asks a question of the whole organization in their own language and gets an answer grounded in its real structure, not a list of search results.

  3. 2029

    Drift is caught before it costs anything

    The distance between what leadership intends and what teams do surfaces in the week it opens up, rather than in an exit interview eight months later.

  4. 2030

    Every organization runs on a model of itself

    The way finance has run on a ledger for five hundred years. Not a deck, not an annual survey, not the memory of whoever has been there longest.

We will publish where we stand against each of these, including the ones we are behind on.

Who is building it

We have done this before, from both sides of the problem

The methodology inside Green Apple is a practice, encoded. The platform was built by the person who scaled the last one.

Heba Tannerah

Heba Tannerah

Co-Founder, OD & People

Ten years in organizational development and People & Culture across MENA tech. As People & Culture Manager at Qoyod she built the HR function and a 60-engineer development centre from scratch. What Green Apple knows about organizations is her practice, written down.

Yacoub Kanita

Yacoub Kanita

Co-Founder, Technology & Product

Eighteen years in software, delivery and data products. As Director of Product Development at Qoyod he drove 800% revenue growth and 840% customer growth over four years. He built the Green Apple platform end to end.

Start with the model

Create a workspace and build your organization's DNA in an afternoon, or talk to us about what you are actually trying to change.